{"id":"W4389721664","doi":"10.1190/image2023-3911157.1","title":"Comparison of magnetic vector inversion with sparse norm susceptibility inversion accounting for demagnetization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inversion (geology); Demagnetizing field; Isotropy; Inverse problem; Magnetization; Uniqueness; Inverse; Synthetic data; Computer science; Physics; Algorithm; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Geology; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Magnetic field; Optics; Geometry; Seismology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001500567,0.0009335268,0.0005885948,0.0005258038,0.0002902214,0.0008179546,0.0008823015,0.0009335308,0.001824925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00905844,0.0002680358,0.000454508,0.0005579208,0.0005887779,0.001567079,0.0008421105,0.0008588675,0.0004248636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003141344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001059401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009072584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009615104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997112,0.000109973,0.00002174537,0.00005213574,0.00006985174,0.00003515553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997355,0.001560456,0.0001393042,0.0003996803,0.000457129,0.00008845044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005571879,0.0001349071,0.001829355,0.000148726,0.0001027206,0.00008594262,0.0001099158,0.9128345,0.01101099,0.006802308,0.001379324,0.06500419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002563267,0.00006414745,0.0003691468,0.000009765059,0.00001284705,0.0000438945,0.00002733186,0.9934009,0.00305918,0.002335224,0.0006399149,0.00001204051],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2938859,0.000672132,0.6890132,0.001055671,0.0001438533,0.0001131853,0.0007197574,0.003164252,0.01123207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003157,0.0003262895,0.1943509,0.0002285974,0.0000521785,0.00007738541,0.001724455,0.0006242418,0.002300197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009072584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01803952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03395434022647861,"score_gpt":0.2736179659127045,"score_spread":0.2396636256862259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}