{"id":"W4389998731","doi":"10.1186/s40900-023-00531-5","title":"Recommended characteristics and processes for writing lay summaries of healthcare evidence: a co-created scoping review and consultation exercise","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Involvement and Engagement","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; PsycINFO; Scopus; Resource (disambiguation); MEDLINE; Medical education; Psychology; Grey literature; Stakeholder; Health care; Jargon; Medicine; Computer science; Psychological intervention; Nursing; Public relations; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5199217,0.004320628,0.005563917,0.04662231,0.01022999,0.01734593,0.00917595,0.009962223,0.01250425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6648699,0.005011099,0.00817499,0.02940664,0.006366788,0.02066452,0.02184602,0.009462225,0.008805776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01933674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1053714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004611883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01369301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3466032,0.4676466,0.1412901,0.009899717,0.03083523,0.003725009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2111628,0.5229549,0.04855073,0.03841396,0.1705832,0.008334531],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001469013,0.0007987744,0.005049924,0.1230023,0.00105,0.003381524,0.166112,0.003824985,0.006232233,0.01754409,0.1196325,0.5519027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001743735,0.001227844,0.007008499,0.2589358,0.002307439,0.002691954,0.0848919,0.01057245,0.007446261,0.05981694,0.5619897,0.001367448],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02536852,0.01525737,0.4452065,0.07219115,0.004639775,0.3945965,0.007653894,0.005149517,0.02993676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0218463,0.005439095,0.814342,0.00199416,0.0004872299,0.1507237,0.002217899,0.0003755293,0.002574154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4800783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5920221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9167692821862917,"score_gpt":0.6534315476691016,"score_spread":0.2633377345171901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}