{"id":"W4390055333","doi":"10.1002/leap.1587","title":"Academic misconduct, fake authorship letters, cyber fraud: Evidence from the <i>International Political Science Review</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Politics; Publishing; Key (lock); Financial fraud; Political science; Scientific misconduct; Fake news; Business; Internet privacy; Advertising; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Accounting; Computer security; Computer science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02311894,0.0001722838,0.0002099717,0.0001461576,0.001501318,0.002215788,0.004292552,0.0006470182,0.0009746472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0779024,0.0001329936,0.0001208103,0.001815374,0.001229967,0.006557459,0.000525644,0.005939296,0.0007599357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003723102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008215668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02002332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004886251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941924,0.0008259693,0.0004342383,0.0006612423,0.002547138,0.001339006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462,0.004029324,0.0001877014,0.0003966602,0.000308984,0.0004573888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007986816,0.000005966981,0.01115202,0.00001837022,0.00001886583,0.00001384001,0.01266214,0.000006930748,0.003116321,0.2469888,0.7216868,0.004321977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001627079,0.000007146007,0.01111879,0.002483563,0.00005091281,0.000006738793,0.008456044,0.000284445,0.0005216131,0.0556906,0.9207615,0.0004559795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08949669,0.001913977,0.0001361294,0.8695782,0.002501203,0.0002807089,0.00003877183,0.0003227475,0.03573161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8752406,0.004516061,0.0003856135,0.1103328,0.004957131,0.0000339338,0.00006395778,0.00002533769,0.004444655],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7857438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1315166346494007,"score_gpt":0.3844966041811868,"score_spread":0.2529799695317861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}