{"id":"W4390083449","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad104.0878","title":"CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF FRABONI SCALE OF AGEISM IN A CHINESE-MAJORITY SAMPLE FROM SINGAPORE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Innovation in Aging","topic":"Aging and Gerontology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confirmatory factor analysis; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Construct validity; Exploratory factor analysis; Goodness of fit; Sample (material); Construct (python library); Test (biology); Population; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Demography; Structural equation modeling; Geography; Computer science; Cartography; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001668051,0.0002578628,0.0003696841,0.001033131,0.0006061274,0.0005131696,0.0002662688,0.0001660383,0.001529759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002458308,0.0001311205,0.0005178538,0.000823817,0.0003952169,0.0002481234,0.0005653606,0.0003993208,0.0001963237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006372978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008505625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01620858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02268806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994676,0.0001021769,0.00007398242,0.00006351105,0.000240863,0.00005183121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987841,0.0001715364,0.0003763556,0.00009275871,0.000379207,0.0001960547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000377887,0.00006185299,0.9890164,0.0000378909,0.00003248398,0.0001145083,0.00275473,0.00005093807,0.0006398064,0.00008961753,0.0002364661,0.0069275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003515692,0.00005508969,0.9973752,0.00001404821,0.000008509285,0.0001085313,0.001645055,0.0002836855,0.0001585493,0.00004060757,0.0003012136,0.000006002598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991405,0.00002778701,0.00006353448,0.00002517679,0.00000276831,0.00001721481,0.0001334345,0.000001349465,0.0005881364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990983,0.0000417198,0.0002805371,0.00001219406,0.000002182512,0.00003420886,0.0002800787,0.000001071976,0.0002497625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01620858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03222847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08338141512245657,"score_gpt":0.4091494279671564,"score_spread":0.3257680128446999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}