{"id":"W4390098501","doi":"10.1109/models-c59198.2023.00046","title":"Deriving Safety Assurance Case Argumentation from WF+ Models","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Safety case; Workflow; Certification; Software deployment; Computer science; Safety assurance; Quality assurance; Risk analysis (engineering); Work (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Systems engineering; Process management; Management science; Software engineering; Engineering; Operations management; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008646544,0.001314327,0.0007279849,0.004964913,0.001973506,0.005462357,0.002088575,0.002301924,0.007054607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03545486,0.001065485,0.003389675,0.001649838,0.002860915,0.005028349,0.006607009,0.002746682,0.00173671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002322152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002903343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004087651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006446682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920912,0.003735113,0.0006677941,0.0006482968,0.002495429,0.0003621526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790825,0.01470836,0.001104911,0.002429383,0.002321024,0.0003539144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001083872,0.0002112754,0.001991458,0.0005506894,0.0001033091,0.001555366,0.004851572,0.06033663,0.00629524,0.8350555,0.002950546,0.08598999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001055917,0.0001094066,0.0006337134,0.0006121151,0.0001040966,0.000437139,0.0017113,0.2881208,0.01046021,0.6205388,0.07707638,0.00009052183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01527218,0.00008203728,0.9675588,0.0005938818,0.00004500827,0.0004180021,0.0004259532,0.0005300927,0.01507409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1347728,0.0002115781,0.8584768,0.0001333842,0.00003165474,0.0004716656,0.001321456,0.0002413414,0.004339248],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008646544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04572785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01516608169533154,"score_gpt":0.2067092071159969,"score_spread":0.1915431254206653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}