{"id":"W4390117017","doi":"10.33524/cjar.v23i3.645","title":"Using Participatory Action Research to Connect Research Agendas with User Needs: A Crowdsourcing Case Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Action Research","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crowdsourcing; Citizen journalism; Knowledge management; Stakeholder; Participatory action research; Action research; Process (computing); Public relations; Action (physics); Stakeholder engagement; Business; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Pedagogy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0509816,0.0001600719,0.0002492826,0.008223058,0.006154274,0.002057315,0.001869803,0.0001094807,0.0000925656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003124249,0.000122308,0.00006155689,0.02134537,0.0005835304,0.00111422,0.0003994245,0.003597757,0.0002665818],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002199798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007621697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1173459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2741297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881944,0.005594007,0.0005745901,0.000406134,0.00347767,0.001753168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876989,0.002671697,0.0001397397,0.001130962,0.007191208,0.001167501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009311351,0.0008581747,0.09616786,0.0002113747,0.001257725,0.08862936,0.4672523,0.07743412,0.01713955,0.01274258,0.1614297,0.07594603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002828859,0.007236148,0.02964797,0.0007270884,0.00006010036,0.02054349,0.7994083,0.02089012,0.006356032,0.002940376,0.1083085,0.001053054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852887,0.00002371475,0.003906532,0.00892604,0.0003618116,0.001078846,0.000003409205,0.00004628513,0.0003646823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972901,0.000003007306,0.001037039,0.00007249001,0.0004236541,0.00006195671,4.661119e-7,0.00004379305,0.001067502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3321559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8058181059174339,"score_gpt":0.5791021613981356,"score_spread":0.2267159445192982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}