{"id":"W4390270510","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13059","title":"Trends and dynamics of philanthropic funding for biodiversity conservation in China","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Science and Practice","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Studio Emad Eddin Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Convention on Biological Diversity; China; Government (linguistics); Business; Biodiversity conservation; Private sector; Environmental resource management; Convention; Diversity (politics); Environmental planning; Political science; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002356837,0.0003260995,0.0003040292,0.004923646,0.001131417,0.001753501,0.000883937,0.0005090917,0.004365896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005232132,0.0002120941,0.000261898,0.007915544,0.0008264151,0.001323289,0.002023646,0.0006076787,0.0002607472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005187158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01668854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05679156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06044303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978485,0.0003114637,0.0002121222,0.0002094591,0.0007502814,0.0006681987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925244,0.0008185632,0.001977379,0.0002605804,0.002439901,0.001979118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002796017,0.0001209802,0.7416974,0.00112429,0.0001748755,0.001234134,0.003279734,0.001747106,0.002218639,0.02405974,0.02875165,0.1953118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003020463,0.00005874354,0.9487635,0.0001942015,0.00004653471,0.0002940843,0.001958673,0.002510976,0.0004431623,0.001096619,0.04456465,0.00003855598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535712,0.009435291,0.0007232536,0.01073039,0.0001638907,0.0001183368,0.002859401,0.0001653094,0.02223284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893352,0.003440483,0.0004830648,0.0004342528,0.00006526495,0.00008293556,0.001302146,0.00001133265,0.004845405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05679156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04953091224418395,"score_gpt":0.2941095674131148,"score_spread":0.2445786551689308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}