{"id":"W4390528655","doi":"","title":"Relative intensity of bilateral trade flows, regional integration, and trade performance: the case of Brazil, 1984-1998","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intensity (physics); Economics; International economics; International trade; Bilateral trade; Environmental science; Geography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001278394,0.000167769,0.0002779083,0.001824214,0.0005656352,0.0010845,0.0002989906,0.0002269343,0.001059293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005037827,0.0001243082,0.000311534,0.004719084,0.0007745333,0.0008576755,0.001053983,0.0005273872,0.0001171852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002274891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008836279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1020601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1244364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995622,0.0000851575,0.00003476156,0.00006285434,0.0001287297,0.0001262538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978085,0.000554278,0.001095336,0.000109053,0.0003190073,0.0001137751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001039971,0.00004059689,0.9679394,0.00005288903,0.0001584307,0.0004687543,0.001668926,0.004208446,0.0008098221,0.007108335,0.000385921,0.0170543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007975968,0.0000206974,0.9931638,0.00003049452,0.00006788623,0.0001999781,0.00133415,0.001863275,0.0003672521,0.0009574394,0.00197958,0.000007474379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943061,0.0004406966,0.0001668462,0.0001740892,0.000001209455,0.00000540345,0.0002640266,0.000003998261,0.004637678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989923,0.0002948984,0.0001257303,0.000008488663,0.000002722353,0.000003130017,0.0002837636,0.000001673535,0.0002872076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1020601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2029321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2637313963002988,"score_gpt":0.4301480779221499,"score_spread":0.1664166816218511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}