{"id":"W4390539580","doi":"10.1007/s13194-023-00565-2","title":"Inductive risk and epistemically detrimental dissent in policy-relevant science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Philosophy of science; Faith; Harm; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004061203,0.0001574652,0.0001812166,0.001381055,0.001736035,0.0005401684,0.0009182916,0.000009692521,0.00002086508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003614496,0.0001243429,0.00008558114,0.0006804528,0.01722538,0.001777383,0.0001757672,0.0003465814,0.00001693734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002392589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004711146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003452278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006851172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997852,0.00006991893,0.0004516627,0.0004920947,0.0007135851,0.0004207067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990482,0.00009498187,0.0001872572,0.0001627488,0.0002284502,0.0002783966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004800806,0.00008937252,0.00007508095,0.00005443994,0.000007297025,0.00004851585,0.03165178,0.00001280565,0.04045052,0.9136792,0.00007637902,0.01380657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001583158,0.003378356,0.00643089,0.001969054,0.00006681787,0.0005171833,0.006526024,0.001937328,0.006963573,0.9080837,0.06139725,0.001146665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.842511,0.001467684,0.0001843343,0.00420231,0.002720926,0.0002979612,0.00007551856,0.00004555952,0.1484947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980909,0.00008422304,0.000603429,0.00008648436,0.0009359936,0.00000175185,2.4881e-7,0.0000134866,0.0001834709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1555799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04170654725012795,"score_gpt":0.2774333138015308,"score_spread":0.2357267665514028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}