{"id":"W4390586080","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105564","title":"Examining animal testing for risk assessment: A WC-12 workshop report","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives; Health Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Introspection; Engineering ethics; Animal testing; Cornerstone; Animal welfare; Pace; Public relations; Political science; Business; Psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05869642,0.001891029,0.0007440226,0.001794744,0.004881719,0.009170867,0.004224501,0.01087897,0.00998883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02109875,0.0009306844,0.001815743,0.001308504,0.003291681,0.004184753,0.010576,0.01145689,0.002779514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007171196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02056967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01080751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01792631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9818521,0.009607492,0.0009755363,0.001617239,0.004061904,0.001885659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743464,0.0115388,0.0009337106,0.0008779174,0.008152283,0.004150894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009149803,0.00343199,0.003411368,0.004144265,0.0002209486,0.00688926,0.04284205,0.009008734,0.03057657,0.04003835,0.5851802,0.2733413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008911002,0.0008697062,0.002630461,0.002689298,0.00005397343,0.000571408,0.01703419,0.001463255,0.007300296,0.008248356,0.9588737,0.0001762468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1046053,0.05456768,0.09342723,0.4626955,0.06932847,0.01485823,0.002852893,0.0007289422,0.1969358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3992419,0.05155997,0.1053342,0.07852405,0.01517342,0.01079676,0.004646387,0.001308449,0.3334149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05869642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2490546980792564,"score_gpt":0.4653478566714144,"score_spread":0.2162931585921579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}