{"id":"W4390604351","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111510","title":"Vegetation quality assessment: A sampling-based loss-gain accounting framework for native, disturbed and reclaimed vegetation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Teck (Canada)","funders":"Teck Resources","keywords":"Vegetation (pathology); Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Scale (ratio); Sampling design; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Geography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129605,0.0001714439,0.0002250005,0.0001003681,0.0005195522,0.00009186718,0.0001295376,0.0002537725,0.0001846109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001174281,0.000143317,0.00007189604,0.0004726062,0.0004253155,0.0002088775,0.00008912766,0.0003172818,0.00004917897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002574155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003357713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006067285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001193411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984809,0.0001663922,0.0003593938,0.0005117548,0.0001963457,0.0002851874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968116,0.002815684,0.0001722617,0.0001062495,0.00001889688,0.00007536414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002505212,0.0002162384,0.8749167,0.0002050193,0.00008870355,0.000005971464,0.0008399876,0.003182325,0.0001719812,0.1127837,0.00006446755,0.007499807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002377111,0.0001090861,0.9054106,0.00003606094,0.00003522207,7.090612e-7,0.00007595559,0.02249974,0.00005785852,0.07100898,0.0003448963,0.0001831964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8856687,0.0001447621,0.1106077,0.001337987,0.0003140457,0.0005195395,0.00000910004,0.0001537388,0.001244476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974981,0.00001789971,0.02403802,0.0005681929,0.00004466832,0.0002500059,0.00005028236,0.00001407941,0.00003582601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08931234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5844298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03340542788337415,"score_gpt":0.3528764947473456,"score_spread":0.3194710668639714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}