{"id":"W4390678812","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.26.3.0283","title":"Nietzsche’s Mad Eloquence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Aphorism; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Ethos; Style (visual arts); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Irrationality; Literature; Confusion; Rhetorical device; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Art; Psychology; Rationality; Psychoanalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005310489,0.0003910629,0.0003100448,0.00169228,0.004314792,0.006229538,0.0007323331,0.002531238,0.002738291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01276986,0.0002187402,0.0002068885,0.000537261,0.02510383,0.006772833,0.00371095,0.004277951,0.0006739393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004353696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001774147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002223184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00246846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937658,0.003872073,0.0001375783,0.0005630347,0.001349963,0.0003115825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940073,0.004513522,0.0002884072,0.0004171866,0.0006458029,0.0001276859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008359631,0.000003150999,0.00006313091,0.00001569277,0.000001679885,0.00004498512,0.005512952,0.00004353962,0.0001081083,0.9898084,0.002038013,0.002352027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001960423,0.00002618507,0.0002233264,0.0002351712,0.00001315457,0.000290411,0.005839674,0.0007056111,0.001522033,0.5678216,0.4232708,0.00003238238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06320347,0.008288428,0.02973012,0.1105021,0.002493289,0.00005253163,0.000077973,0.0001916164,0.7854605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631804,0.001032696,0.002566376,0.003728275,0.0004498328,0.00003065676,0.00001509816,0.00005802118,0.02893861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006229538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03158849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1440443448849555,"score_gpt":0.2855232703451368,"score_spread":0.1414789254601813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}