{"id":"W4390678812","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.26.3.0283","title":"Nietzsche’s Mad Eloquence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Aphorism; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Ethos; Style (visual arts); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Irrationality; Literature; Confusion; Rhetorical device; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Art; Psychology; Rationality; Psychoanalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005133183,0.00008192056,0.0001527835,0.00009408705,0.000688654,0.00002169452,0.0004051172,0.00001951011,0.0003059013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007535477,0.0000524003,0.0001694112,0.00005261456,0.0002457191,0.0001168082,0.00004693429,0.0001535285,0.000100023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002845341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000900936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003022834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002369637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999289,0.00003285168,0.0002637607,0.00006687742,0.0001991602,0.0001483502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998931,0.0003134422,0.000239172,0.0002474106,0.0002360986,0.00003291489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000185894,0.00001663385,0.00002268737,0.00001518325,0.0000654132,6.594905e-7,0.02610497,0.000009711577,0.0000397386,0.08086685,0.888959,0.003880566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001483391,0.00005375057,0.0001092089,0.00001461554,0.00003401367,0.00000605831,0.005806254,0.00008219934,0.000002944325,0.003032676,0.9906416,0.00006835486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02915799,0.2445915,0.002543434,0.02060378,0.1778574,0.001357157,0.00009284232,0.000717465,0.5230784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2616146,0.006208703,0.0001001396,0.0002136963,0.001383952,0.00005107052,0.000002556761,0.0000244063,0.7304009],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2383828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.529664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1440443448849555,"score_gpt":0.2855232703451368,"score_spread":0.1414789254601813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}