{"id":"W4390953316","doi":"10.20944/preprints202401.1133.v1","title":"Interpretable Software Defect Prediction from Project Effort and Static Code Metrics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Fanshawe College","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretability; Computer science; Predictive modelling; Software quality; Machine learning; Reliability (semiconductor); Software; Random forest; Data mining; Software metric; Support vector machine; Software bug; Artificial intelligence; Source code; Code (set theory); Quality (philosophy); Software development; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004072748,0.0009265561,0.0003918159,0.003464042,0.000178507,0.001180923,0.0006524319,0.0007808704,0.00124015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03016266,0.0002298321,0.0007152457,0.002107838,0.0003824419,0.00149268,0.0008497414,0.0009996607,0.000289165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008093312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007244332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003327494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00620856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979835,0.0008729675,0.00016057,0.0003923968,0.0004849491,0.0001056265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697456,0.01985802,0.004389884,0.003200514,0.00255515,0.0002507678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003741274,0.000449156,0.5053187,0.0004256618,0.0003232984,0.0003972928,0.001178605,0.2841025,0.003640376,0.009459658,0.004098221,0.1902325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000228181,0.0001639386,0.1109916,0.00007677401,0.00006430039,0.00011353,0.0003196808,0.8683755,0.002548517,0.01561274,0.001672466,0.00003817783],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7948373,0.0002803366,0.1946971,0.0006732189,0.00002981657,0.0001356404,0.005457707,0.001146884,0.00274198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754563,0.00007392003,0.02022238,0.00002196924,0.000009170953,0.00006739077,0.003713792,0.00003896672,0.0003961943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004072748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02153897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08852903946235081,"score_gpt":0.3473491410098894,"score_spread":0.2588201015475386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}