{"id":"W4390980009","doi":"10.1017/s000842392300063x","title":"Erosion of International Organizations’ Legitimacy under Superpower Rivalry: Evidence on the International Court of Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Superpower; Legitimacy; Rivalry; Political science; International court; Nationality; International relations; International law; Law; Public international law; Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Immigration; China; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01254715,0.000154161,0.0004815283,0.001337905,0.002166713,0.004030822,0.0006132708,0.001207085,0.007836241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08817925,0.0001972794,0.0002473618,0.001429685,0.008595651,0.002930876,0.002501484,0.002104637,0.0003076163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001907582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001246295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01031518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008883384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886233,0.005656934,0.000431251,0.001189122,0.002997143,0.00110234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8419018,0.09313859,0.04299776,0.008434785,0.009542899,0.003984185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003114414,0.001784085,0.7233784,0.000431376,0.0004666554,0.001043877,0.06408828,0.00161408,0.005989563,0.1238969,0.003405179,0.07078737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002673371,0.0008953713,0.9171034,0.0001814807,0.000217078,0.0001962225,0.03721336,0.002337977,0.002272853,0.02814429,0.01107983,0.00009076799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581268,0.0001392776,0.0003731244,0.001335775,0.00001956248,0.00001268111,0.00002402862,0.000003891367,0.0399649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997093,0.00003001313,0.00002708099,0.0000763749,0.00001033205,0.00000245831,0.000007128873,0.000001326209,0.0001360236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01254715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06635648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04377610237541704,"score_gpt":0.3601428510069226,"score_spread":0.3163667486315055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}