{"id":"W4391026342","doi":"10.1145/3640760","title":"Optimized Distortion and Proportional Fairness in Voting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Voting; Distortion (music); Anti-plurality voting; Outcome (game theory); Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Social Welfare; Majority rule; Unit (ring theory); Disapproval voting; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01272857,0.0009684003,0.001971629,0.001107008,0.001123228,0.003830256,0.002490278,0.001412833,0.003428128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05286536,0.0005351306,0.00135406,0.00121582,0.003552656,0.004075565,0.00241151,0.001789295,0.000581092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004225405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002041078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002785924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001633202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815611,0.009065022,0.001079304,0.00258047,0.003963872,0.001750147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653317,0.02199277,0.002650579,0.006786589,0.002298587,0.0009398799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001098207,0.000121948,0.004921556,0.0001640892,0.000206295,0.0001444491,0.0004752916,0.6187829,0.003298468,0.3152542,0.001518974,0.05401366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001113119,0.000226211,0.00147674,0.00003750134,0.00005562842,0.0001555968,0.000140965,0.6751434,0.004368649,0.3160515,0.002175805,0.00005674973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1908531,0.0006383477,0.7924742,0.0006580786,0.000117421,0.0002155438,0.0003330985,0.0003031994,0.01440705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169905,0.000201069,0.07879635,0.0001234063,0.00005382473,0.0001587277,0.0002318208,0.00009777588,0.003346492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01272857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06731594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02759538125911926,"score_gpt":0.2351484438153203,"score_spread":0.2075530625562011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}