{"id":"W4391068719","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130649","title":"Evaluation of seven satellite-based and two reanalysis global terrestrial evapotranspiration products","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Environment Canada; University of California Berkeley; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; International Max Planck Research School for global Biogeochemical Cycles; Beijing Normal University; University of Virginia; Università degli Studi della Tuscia; Université Laval; Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Biological and Environmental Research; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Evapotranspiration; Environmental science; Satellite; Scale (ratio); Land cover; Product (mathematics); Water balance; Climatology; Meteorology; Land use; Mathematics; Geography; Cartography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003197652,0.0006506084,0.0004436685,0.001051843,0.000426938,0.001093967,0.0007060112,0.0005922548,0.001382391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004943286,0.0002404532,0.0005849428,0.001087861,0.0003037337,0.001136802,0.0004132314,0.0002509728,0.0003149153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000968679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009301579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01317256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01623717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999294,0.0001878414,0.00005973661,0.0001732309,0.0002349556,0.00005029723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965478,0.001678166,0.0001918088,0.0002325233,0.001200137,0.0001496346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01070952,0.003063665,0.2753388,0.0009079439,0.00181751,0.0006502523,0.001003286,0.2277419,0.07896931,0.002400922,0.00626964,0.3911271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001386134,0.002840605,0.3341912,0.00006891245,0.001188651,0.0002099958,0.0007522024,0.5818683,0.07036815,0.0007498435,0.006241692,0.0001343619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923348,0.0002036004,0.003556016,0.00006949806,0.00002642053,0.00007698327,0.0015456,0.0003297722,0.0018574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825188,0.0001302604,0.01262152,0.00002188364,0.000008559204,0.00004646714,0.003897302,0.00006103693,0.0006942434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01317256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02619177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01786028341326801,"score_gpt":0.2728187150279933,"score_spread":0.2549584316147253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}