{"id":"W4391244030","doi":"10.30725/2619-0303-2016-4-64-68","title":"Structural-semiological approach to museum and museum object: towards analysis of theory by E. Taborsky","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Interpretation (philosophy); Semiotics; Sign (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Phenomenon; Sociology; Museology; Point (geometry); Museum informatics; Epistemology; Computer science; Visual arts; Linguistics; History; Art; Philosophy; Archaeology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001874408,0.0002169911,0.0006287293,0.0001676309,0.0001357405,0.0000189686,0.0003102491,0.00008860956,0.0006575264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003425694,0.000132464,0.000238929,0.0001645908,0.0007038674,0.0002348822,0.0001287668,0.00009448444,0.000001571637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000461123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001934238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009843206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001794909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998812,0.0001051512,0.0002800241,0.0003334652,0.0002344553,0.0002349006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990484,0.00005935749,0.0002704712,0.0002441742,0.0002372861,0.0001403192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002004015,0.0006277935,0.003484669,0.000742621,0.005432061,0.00002977098,0.4101933,0.0002278279,0.143649,0.3866302,0.02805762,0.01892118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006024624,0.003711991,0.07724717,0.0008863387,0.004241684,0.00001392518,0.3290697,0.0004043097,0.007159117,0.006726952,0.5615954,0.002918769],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991867,0.0001663283,0.0003453839,0.0002831927,0.00005122856,0.0002457314,0.001181886,0.00003271995,0.005826514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953299,0.0001928941,0.0004936274,0.00005572909,0.00002334592,5.958433e-7,0.00005391597,0.000008062668,0.003841897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5335378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7199453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01485314772372382,"score_gpt":0.1911119687427509,"score_spread":0.176258821019027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}