{"id":"W4391388358","doi":"10.22541/au.170669909.92042889/v1","title":"A bibliometric analysis of personal protective equipment and COVID-19 researches","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"COVID-19 impact on air quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Web of science; Personal protective equipment; Citation; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Bibliometrics; Science Citation Index; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Citation analysis; Library science; Public health; Data science; Medicine; Outbreak; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; Virology; Pathology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00875073,0.0007415705,0.002074888,0.2111816,0.001730948,0.005929178,0.001032914,0.0008496896,0.005755666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06484969,0.0002962925,0.002475628,0.2706122,0.001158074,0.004031191,0.003005879,0.0005970331,0.000880986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004303162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006492067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008709597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007013462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852051,0.00241736,0.003481539,0.001310122,0.00687922,0.000706545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9240498,0.04650399,0.01297785,0.001789885,0.01332801,0.001350514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003687073,0.0002092725,0.7030226,0.03397439,0.003107837,0.001380999,0.009118008,0.001850737,0.001376096,0.007411319,0.0276503,0.2105296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005799128,0.0002049976,0.8872613,0.006916148,0.003291095,0.001738369,0.01625818,0.004626305,0.001234592,0.0051663,0.0730769,0.0001678367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7654372,0.07786307,0.004431798,0.004952651,0.0004650452,0.001535839,0.09651333,0.0005955769,0.04820547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363239,0.0288724,0.004816772,0.0002081714,0.0004152398,0.001104276,0.02629592,0.0000883992,0.001874925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7888184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04627889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1457621941146543,"score_gpt":0.4313298391446003,"score_spread":0.2855676450299459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}