{"id":"W4391484687","doi":"10.1080/03610918.2024.2306541","title":"An empirical comparison between gradient boosting methods and cox’s proportional hazards model for right-censored survival data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation","topic":"Statistical Methods and Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Proportional hazards model; Statistics; Accelerated failure time model; Survival analysis; Mathematics; Boosting (machine learning); Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04178652,0.000924964,0.001626959,0.001960044,0.0007174785,0.00122243,0.001654732,0.001653179,0.002247108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09194774,0.0003460163,0.001337458,0.001968116,0.001122346,0.002276366,0.001424731,0.002040855,0.0004900061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009414715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001892147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002333167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001465799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989089,0.008630783,0.0002059522,0.0006342864,0.001139093,0.00030081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9187538,0.06997196,0.001607063,0.00478281,0.003846968,0.001037448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002560937,0.0005220721,0.06960753,0.001167349,0.001180397,0.0004015008,0.0005594137,0.4654319,0.001157606,0.07833219,0.0237522,0.3553268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001636157,0.0003935023,0.01187285,0.0002103191,0.0001844671,0.0004271533,0.0001360451,0.933915,0.0006697563,0.0448142,0.007157467,0.00005566702],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1295686,0.01826375,0.8426785,0.002887781,0.0006624348,0.000318022,0.0006034847,0.0007261553,0.004291131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7365699,0.004184718,0.2532387,0.0008479496,0.0005225606,0.0003957599,0.001771359,0.0002925404,0.002176418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04178652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2209909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.558174232570392,"score_gpt":0.6209398290377081,"score_spread":0.06276559646731605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}