{"id":"W4391540577","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00568-7","title":"Ethnobiological kinds and material grounding: comments on Ludwig","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover","keywords":"Naturalness; Materiality (auditing); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Analytic philosophy; Philosophy of technology; Sociology; Animism; Metaphysics; Contemporary philosophy; Aesthetics; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001991253,0.0001341186,0.0001496825,0.0003046653,0.001523057,0.0005615343,0.0005777194,0.00001216422,0.000154722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006137284,0.00009573784,0.00008418088,0.00009521798,0.004834545,0.0006376571,0.00008530034,0.0002068926,0.0000351677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004342227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004274734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001301435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.89657e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987219,0.00006625229,0.0002908929,0.0003051204,0.0003555754,0.0002602456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994512,0.00006872931,0.0001066112,0.0001145021,0.00009718008,0.0001617974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007338038,0.00005545563,0.000004026289,0.00004631624,0.000009778122,0.00003659141,0.00568094,0.000001674865,0.00783162,0.9781614,0.002033057,0.006065778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007075415,0.004987971,0.0005695743,0.0007542649,0.00004007264,0.0002022161,0.0008056387,0.0001695981,0.001454095,0.374954,0.6148223,0.0005326589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5041298,0.0003618078,0.0000745932,0.007491868,0.01135546,0.0002165246,0.000123372,0.0000936774,0.4761529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970047,0.00002090052,0.0001904932,0.0004560688,0.001847309,0.000001233037,0.000001354545,0.00001157391,0.0004663708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6127893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1236161015106849,"score_gpt":0.291316817786281,"score_spread":0.1677007162755961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}