{"id":"W4391582831","doi":"10.5751/es-14605-290113","title":"Livelihood vulnerability and human-wildlife interactions across protected areas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Livelihood; Wildlife; Vulnerability (computing); Geography; Environmental resource management; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Vulnerability assessment; Environmental planning; Fishery; Agroforestry; Ecology; Psychological resilience; Environmental science; Agriculture; Biology; Computer science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006260023,0.0002448703,0.000237969,0.001021233,0.001160235,0.0009198779,0.0002739776,0.0002952579,0.00185623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00277974,0.0001216076,0.000257267,0.001087621,0.0009429267,0.0007766237,0.001718685,0.0003482414,0.0000828916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000840245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004964132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01708187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0468838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993694,0.0002337106,0.00003063208,0.00009681398,0.00008432821,0.0001850361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981328,0.0004949021,0.0009296164,0.00009217028,0.0001210825,0.0002294286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002352151,0.00002874334,0.9874983,0.00003879665,0.0001222455,0.0001574194,0.002996877,0.0006508125,0.000578322,0.0003815699,0.00007307867,0.007450222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.396283e-7,0.00002924924,0.9965253,0.00001652883,0.00001392892,0.00007023925,0.002307836,0.0004036397,0.00004362132,0.000300664,0.0002843651,0.000003891105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988087,0.00009313578,0.000189845,0.00004988328,8.317611e-7,0.000007411285,0.00006772161,0.000001340077,0.0007810239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999777,0.00003748208,0.00008517815,0.000004303045,9.376828e-7,0.000005235634,0.00002898085,3.333554e-7,0.00006055694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01708187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03396487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01412628523988644,"score_gpt":0.2602580691336808,"score_spread":0.2461317838937943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}