{"id":"W4391608398","doi":"10.1111/1365-2435.14483","title":"Editors are biased too: An extension of Fox et al. (2023)'s analysis makes the case for triple‐blind review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Ecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Instituto Superior de Agronomia; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication bias; Identity (music); Gender bias; Biology; Double blind; Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Psychology; Social psychology; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Aesthetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5645525,0.001906147,0.005253214,0.009331036,0.005334773,0.009674386,0.006183357,0.008766305,0.009258701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8316708,0.001683725,0.01112184,0.008636307,0.009735635,0.01292376,0.009365706,0.006939184,0.002307683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004935334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01318117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004840565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004053433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2260883,0.5690678,0.07296946,0.03057281,0.09585919,0.005442436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06263142,0.7559097,0.06118919,0.07581278,0.04239985,0.002057149],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01481742,0.0008238624,0.1161709,0.02715327,0.02310095,0.001827363,0.02311373,0.002530324,0.001804209,0.2284702,0.1668531,0.3933346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007271343,0.003238922,0.07267374,0.02736576,0.02928689,0.004430747,0.005337365,0.03244809,0.01063046,0.4763255,0.3298636,0.001127602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07978365,0.03137797,0.6572334,0.1428095,0.02216674,0.02021655,0.008241148,0.001127145,0.03704393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6706195,0.003697288,0.1995215,0.08400816,0.007228592,0.02207695,0.001371171,0.000587501,0.01088933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4354475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5369843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5685267737783857,"score_gpt":0.5729761752933773,"score_spread":0.004449401514991624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}