{"id":"W4391875055","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2023-0345","title":"Assessing embodied carbon for reinforced concrete structures in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Greenhouse gas; Reinforced concrete; Carbon fibers; Embodied energy; Computer science; Environmental science; Architectural engineering; Engineering; Civil engineering; Structural engineering; Ecology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006247492,0.0006126372,0.0002975536,0.00255811,0.002355616,0.001595426,0.001093727,0.00048102,0.0009864414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001283516,0.0002891838,0.0006609471,0.003806607,0.0008833467,0.0004374862,0.0006446283,0.00039672,0.0001365563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0801186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03814203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986629,0.00006221261,0.0000290269,0.00008033026,0.0009581088,0.0002073823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990618,0.00008684187,0.00007059002,0.00002082786,0.000707705,0.00005233043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000537671,0.0002419898,0.2887059,0.0009770994,0.0005731327,0.001629385,0.003694613,0.503773,0.02374762,0.02511173,0.004825016,0.1461828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005576062,0.00033601,0.7295195,0.0003495147,0.000429712,0.0003505034,0.008908152,0.1782769,0.02995112,0.003674606,0.04781491,0.0003331681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665602,0.001622475,0.003769917,0.0002181291,0.000009013597,0.00009616851,0.002360181,0.000049217,0.02531477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895192,0.001039618,0.003578135,0.00002829445,0.000001109944,0.00002435842,0.0008954667,0.00002181961,0.004891874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0801186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5813038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006443567438867903,"score_gpt":0.2038854913833921,"score_spread":0.1974419239445242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}