{"id":"W4392058114","doi":"10.11124/jbies-23-00463","title":"Common tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment: implications for systematic reviewers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"JBI Evidence Synthesis","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Interpretation (philosophy); Risk assessment; Psychology; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); MEDLINE; Medicine; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1594027,0.0009802531,0.02168138,0.001192031,0.000232497,0.00161863,0.003582027,0.0003158622,0.0003295874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2654143,0.0004151542,0.007011467,0.002765899,0.000116935,0.0003170774,0.0004330568,0.0003279686,0.0004954791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001399081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003280823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001487229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001655305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9502896,0.02501763,0.01880841,0.002173396,0.003323997,0.0003869849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8706136,0.1046308,0.01571516,0.008006682,0.0007734231,0.0002603176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.085933e-7,0.00001247667,0.0001243168,0.4380824,0.001118403,3.724678e-7,0.00007552551,0.000003167246,1.705702e-7,0.004977345,0.009779111,0.5458258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000228233,0.00005710029,0.0003250533,0.4035871,0.05838669,0.00004471527,0.0002584239,0.0004015872,8.100701e-7,0.01106083,0.5251008,0.0007539964],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001648109,0.9780687,0.007402896,0.0004908583,0.0001875805,0.01294429,0.0005986238,0.00001349344,0.000277042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005087133,0.9730805,0.01760029,0.00003478968,0.0001086093,0.007494104,0.000008779399,0.00006296279,0.001101218],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5450718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8035223189047707,"score_gpt":0.5652015570574548,"score_spread":0.2383207618473159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}