{"id":"W4392058114","doi":"10.11124/jbies-23-00463","title":"Common tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment: implications for systematic reviewers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"JBI Evidence Synthesis","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Interpretation (philosophy); Risk assessment; Psychology; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); MEDLINE; Medicine; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8407164,0.006434166,0.01684536,0.06287124,0.01210512,0.04007514,0.01719761,0.02279909,0.006714747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9561134,0.007380982,0.01781231,0.07064808,0.03594862,0.03203509,0.02131329,0.03056039,0.003917418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03987525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09576058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01693762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02599457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.05471198,0.7237234,0.1552757,0.006561916,0.05823155,0.001495422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.01733138,0.7963119,0.04934512,0.02157288,0.1141699,0.001268811],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001119567,0.0001515546,0.004756282,0.2404728,0.009913987,0.0003461739,0.02994155,0.003746625,0.0005204499,0.2087987,0.1001993,0.400033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001871645,0.0003847397,0.002857337,0.4567601,0.008004185,0.0008269488,0.00632117,0.01013887,0.001135115,0.4308012,0.07963772,0.001260931],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001969715,0.2133018,0.4809962,0.253244,0.01438732,0.02347756,0.002435551,0.00138549,0.00880235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02470665,0.06388131,0.84781,0.01956895,0.004461324,0.03796565,0.000596059,0.000468555,0.000541389],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1592836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2893166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8035223189047707,"score_gpt":0.5652015570574548,"score_spread":0.2383207618473159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}