{"id":"W4392188135","doi":"10.1002/mp.16994","title":"Impact of cone‐beam computed tomography artifacts on dose calculation accuracy for lung cancer","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Cone beam computed tomography; Computed tomography; Lung cancer; Nuclear medicine; Image-guided radiation therapy; Medical imaging; Medicine; Cancer; Tomography; Computed radiography; Cone beam ct; Dosimetry; Radiology; Medical physics; Computer science; Image quality; Oncology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003541405,0.0004731137,0.0003171022,0.0006570732,0.0002645484,0.001038318,0.0006131916,0.0004065642,0.0009350597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01864446,0.0004010207,0.0006346107,0.000474578,0.0003863688,0.000415409,0.0004885782,0.0003768214,0.000185348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009498676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008600148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004052384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002329211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974891,0.0008710618,0.0003127046,0.0003616404,0.0008833702,0.00008211554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818175,0.01402668,0.001384944,0.001224115,0.001415878,0.0001308104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00232,0.0001901231,0.1174627,0.00114335,0.0006628283,0.0006228359,0.0008317941,0.4067653,0.1821804,0.004420449,0.002777758,0.2806225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001286465,0.0006318323,0.09045913,0.0001877893,0.0004271491,0.002133165,0.0001380821,0.6763608,0.220814,0.002585914,0.005994602,0.0001389734],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6378037,0.005965065,0.3477939,0.0005063156,0.0001743137,0.0001687841,0.0005650037,0.002367698,0.004655168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620729,0.0003439143,0.0363873,0.0001082651,0.00001338112,0.00003449778,0.000256906,0.0004176563,0.0003652003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004052384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01872897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01500722964735817,"score_gpt":0.363255904606274,"score_spread":0.3482486749589158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}