{"id":"W4392239630","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2024.2321192","title":"When more is more: effect of context and stimulus set size on orthographic learning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spelling; Psychology; Orthographic projection; Stimulus (psychology); Reading (process); Set (abstract data type); Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Orthography; Isolation (microbiology); Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058935,0.0002375011,0.000573704,0.0005022059,0.00005207038,0.00003482195,0.0001331808,0.0001840805,0.0009330712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004550299,0.0001774953,0.0002056653,0.0002568846,0.000272339,0.00008663404,0.00002382177,0.0008655168,0.00006952992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001492898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003130476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009274541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.821352e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979597,0.0005585356,0.0006242938,0.0003347802,0.0002408858,0.0002818589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960312,0.003154682,0.0003436086,0.0001231468,0.0002171525,0.0001302479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006146565,0.0002787192,0.2181258,0.0001877334,0.00254895,0.001799113,0.06425112,0.000003473203,0.000757219,0.000371958,0.0315048,0.6740245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01071976,0.01543494,0.8828614,0.003519955,0.0007542833,0.004382588,0.003856215,0.00006636001,0.000767155,0.00117183,0.07581235,0.0006531153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846606,0.004863928,0.0003592236,0.002463112,0.00148776,0.0002307757,0.00002497699,0.00002463641,0.005884984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960389,0.0001741098,0.000086099,0.002193882,0.0001748786,0.00001590193,0.000004468106,0.00003312134,0.0012787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6733714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01800387750146138,"score_gpt":0.3745309695342122,"score_spread":0.3565270920327508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}