{"id":"W4392362522","doi":"10.1080/0960085x.2024.2308541","title":"Designing as trading-off: a practice-based view on smart service systems","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Information Systems","topic":"Service and Product Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Emotive; Soft systems methodology; Service (business); Computer science; Relation (database); Emerging technologies; Information system; Information technology; Knowledge management; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Management information systems; Artificial intelligence; Business; Marketing; Engineering; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02033739,0.001236274,0.0009590261,0.004979122,0.008319786,0.02545571,0.004458005,0.01012564,0.004919722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0183605,0.0009930567,0.0009896581,0.003152621,0.08508694,0.01979258,0.01033095,0.006126859,0.001037646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01341938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009755114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006609599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004693043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9709203,0.02172654,0.0009342891,0.002523969,0.002443461,0.001451452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978787,0.01295806,0.001677565,0.003275878,0.001623336,0.001678147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000206865,0.00008011526,0.001254727,0.0001976875,0.00002459607,0.0003642989,0.0484936,0.001945864,0.000343833,0.9326332,0.001029874,0.01361133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000311193,0.0001295686,0.0007868708,0.0005065565,0.00002902887,0.0004108169,0.03834303,0.005662192,0.0004372894,0.8829661,0.07065411,0.00004336404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09013189,0.00755945,0.3962503,0.1205554,0.0005767599,0.000503237,0.0001027692,0.000321092,0.383999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355183,0.002921362,0.05282807,0.002229264,0.0002060611,0.000286123,0.00004065331,0.0001146308,0.005855615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02545571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1075557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0321399335060859,"score_gpt":0.2436311278610935,"score_spread":0.2114911943550076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}