{"id":"W4392404184","doi":"10.23952/jano.6.2024.1.01","title":"Accelerated Bregman divergence optimization with SMART: An information geometric point of view","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied and Numerical Optimization","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Bregman divergence; Divergence (linguistics); Point (geometry); Kullback–Leibler divergence; Mathematics; Computer science; Optimization problem; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Geometry; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002142587,0.0009381786,0.001173639,0.0005606498,0.0003055079,0.000889659,0.001327547,0.001376523,0.001958949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005709534,0.0005120121,0.0006381603,0.0005030874,0.001843332,0.001687039,0.002318855,0.001793061,0.0005032154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006846025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001167675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001731435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00139174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994416,0.0002219084,0.00002292635,0.00007438347,0.000194417,0.00004484543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987539,0.0006490841,0.0001507088,0.0001769985,0.0001786533,0.00009056593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000855125,0.00003802723,0.00054297,0.0001501666,0.00005042563,0.0001160662,0.0001007827,0.8317986,0.003395034,0.1301377,0.001810597,0.03177419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007644306,0.00002817416,0.00005069633,0.000006939646,0.00000298407,0.00002036257,0.000006067216,0.9839529,0.0004252139,0.01494577,0.0005463511,0.000006778223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01057914,0.0001945865,0.9873962,0.0002941316,0.00003443353,0.00002184397,0.00002135194,0.0001507536,0.001307601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4407013,0.0005604661,0.5506833,0.0003764687,0.0001129368,0.0002198117,0.0001785231,0.0002720987,0.006895136],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002142587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01133126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04291470339763875,"score_gpt":0.3368643906240437,"score_spread":0.2939496872264049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}