{"id":"W4392592459","doi":"10.3389/fmars.2024.1307402","title":"Observing change in pelagic animals as sampling methods shift: the case of Antarctic krill","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Marine Science","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"British Antarctic Survey; Office of Polar Programs; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Natural Environment Research Council; Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries; Sight Research UK; Korea Polar Research Institute; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; University of Tasmania; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission; Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology promotion; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Krill; Pelagic zone; Climate change; Antarctic krill; Environmental science; Temporal scales; Euphausia; Sampling (signal processing); Scale (ratio); Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Fishing; Oceanography; Environmental resource management; Global warming; Fishery; Ecology; Geography; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0380117,0.000457802,0.0004376291,0.001519105,0.004432778,0.00365053,0.001968885,0.004557911,0.0008716509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03941848,0.000478204,0.0008752426,0.001932153,0.005865633,0.004683709,0.005076577,0.004397141,0.0002839416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005471293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003641436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07078642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1179671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9749868,0.0173503,0.0007276073,0.001425111,0.003647674,0.001862574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9623204,0.02092739,0.004676409,0.002682588,0.007310451,0.002082644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004871554,0.0001545885,0.3125197,0.001416533,0.0004346611,0.01680706,0.2428919,0.00355739,0.01087846,0.01455742,0.04064197,0.3556532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005105911,0.0008355675,0.2664231,0.002573287,0.0003840292,0.01161729,0.2696114,0.004318097,0.009765401,0.01804037,0.4158273,0.0005530095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6974888,0.02101843,0.01856504,0.2266169,0.0014401,0.000306363,0.0006208541,0.0001207,0.03382277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9039467,0.01033332,0.04142955,0.03645092,0.0009306449,0.0002391706,0.0002849907,0.0001347232,0.006249965],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07078642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2010275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05452797448425016,"score_gpt":0.3664850122212895,"score_spread":0.3119570377370393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}