{"id":"W4392937270","doi":"10.18438/eblip30482","title":"Analysis of Library School Syllabi Reveals Poor Design and Limited Content about Disability and Accessibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabus; Curriculum; Web accessibility; Content analysis; Library science; Medical education; Rubric; Digital library; Listing (finance); Inclusion (mineral); Usability; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics education; World Wide Web; The Internet; Pedagogy; Medicine; Sociology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002330486,0.0001821354,0.0003478532,0.0002656888,0.0002708503,0.002713569,0.0002606601,0.0001291999,0.000548278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009128848,0.0001554681,0.00009623037,0.00172851,0.001240979,0.3288341,0.0002251379,0.0002053212,0.000006727127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003072709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004056704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001109267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001264385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971892,0.0009427398,0.0008311854,0.0003702106,0.0004377699,0.0002288942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913485,0.007612503,0.0003207018,0.0003289799,0.00008847458,0.0003008491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001443081,0.0002560734,0.6911269,0.002620104,0.0005036697,0.000003138907,0.005089766,0.00009920797,0.00005549079,0.2356109,0.001175023,0.06201667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003252189,0.0002592916,0.9235941,0.0009421224,0.0009118076,0.000002573209,0.01389845,0.01393647,0.0004901236,0.005699559,0.0394658,0.0004744474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255081,0.00567682,0.001090157,0.05703278,0.000135023,0.001201822,0.0001647379,0.0003985714,0.008791983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891701,0.002571129,0.002462025,0.005417447,0.00003716117,0.00004134049,0.00004881689,0.0000082894,0.0002436952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3261206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04527802762114014,"score_gpt":0.3217031134851037,"score_spread":0.2764250858639635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}