{"id":"W4392947957","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0298526","title":"Do statistical heterogeneity methods impact the results of meta- analyses? A meta epidemiological study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Random effects model; Statistics; Confidence interval; Study heterogeneity; Pooling; Medicine; Restricted maximum likelihood; Interquartile range; Mathematics; Sample size determination; Maximum likelihood; Internal medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3632423,0.003999351,0.01719513,0.01347167,0.001411603,0.01125644,0.005789524,0.006624019,0.005096776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6638061,0.003327116,0.0580993,0.01587878,0.004035089,0.01007727,0.00521838,0.007146103,0.000831424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005330944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007016801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003475364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004400524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4121121,0.5115421,0.04076893,0.01535052,0.018689,0.001537302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.246294,0.6945866,0.03053312,0.01973834,0.008163311,0.0006846809],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002756306,0.00007497134,0.0212187,0.109865,0.7623198,0.0003593557,0.0008442846,0.00471823,0.0002682058,0.007659393,0.006486073,0.08342975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004995996,0.001049321,0.01461682,0.08304467,0.8079356,0.0005425119,0.0005757509,0.01013521,0.0009075606,0.0582259,0.01755544,0.0004152837],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007769959,0.8838202,0.08260652,0.01426651,0.004679023,0.002636837,0.00160151,0.0003821591,0.002237313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5051807,0.3041531,0.1500096,0.01547846,0.006801567,0.01491681,0.001668962,0.0008772412,0.000913643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7852356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9732907961212317,"score_gpt":0.7002165803757118,"score_spread":0.2730742157455199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}