{"id":"W4393019664","doi":"10.7202/1108421ar","title":"Sofie Møller, \"Kant’s Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Philosophy; Metaphor; Chemistry; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Theology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007523363,0.0009008122,0.001132707,0.002984127,0.002091393,0.00383484,0.001581774,0.006771957,0.004680145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02060648,0.0006160514,0.0007409246,0.004159195,0.00585689,0.01015057,0.002030712,0.007755856,0.002443042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005485306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008124597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0236304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03571418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936307,0.003085956,0.0003158269,0.0004576451,0.002242059,0.0002678896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887075,0.007631069,0.0007514319,0.0001812809,0.002474106,0.0002546861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004919601,0.00001116825,0.0001922688,0.001479387,0.00004716084,0.00005576531,0.001622464,0.00007148393,0.00007520277,0.07714458,0.8942389,0.02501236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003314329,0.00001886423,0.001438661,0.003875152,0.00004882101,0.00009932236,0.001174602,0.00004913354,0.0002146742,0.06781017,0.9252056,0.00003170854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001459825,0.7618999,0.0004730227,0.2264328,0.00581421,0.000006345505,0.00007563788,0.00001052435,0.005141548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02299893,0.7450636,0.001490748,0.1969036,0.01653484,0.0001432827,0.0002312015,0.00007796211,0.01655579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0236304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04698575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07912949878652227,"score_gpt":0.3163655010616698,"score_spread":0.2372360022751476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}