{"id":"W4393159658","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.14315","title":"Dynamic carbon allocation trade‐off: A robust approach to model tree biomass allometry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Allometry; Biomass (ecology); Tree allometry; Tree (set theory); Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Ecology; Mathematics; Statistics; Econometrics; Biology; Biomass partitioning; Combinatorics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001428278,0.0001231792,0.0001499709,0.0002307955,0.00008070678,0.00001230555,0.0001200017,0.0002117583,0.00002876594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007073187,0.0001206149,0.00002856744,0.0005037162,0.0001527377,0.000120984,0.0001462284,0.0001700744,0.00002665779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005121451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001388227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008999193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00160455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987176,0.0002723566,0.0001970616,0.0004573436,0.00007138093,0.0002842506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996741,0.00009453601,0.00002477681,0.0001464344,0.000001871841,0.00005825494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001484099,0.0007748021,0.1244059,0.0002302109,0.0001177064,0.00002436759,0.002406098,0.6965735,0.01496344,0.05823845,0.002339354,0.09977774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001003463,0.00005487893,0.3649892,0.000003742495,0.00001842097,0.000006155892,0.00005274217,0.6200235,0.00002213967,0.01438584,0.0002545514,0.00008850372],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3598781,0.0003227109,0.625444,0.001023098,0.0003836163,0.000376529,0.000001379428,0.0000727868,0.01249773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7702357,0.00003554334,0.2288836,0.0001334414,0.000007952372,0.0001224461,0.000006486927,0.000008774857,0.0005659919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4103576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4918531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01855271736735738,"score_gpt":0.2933066118332995,"score_spread":0.2747538944659421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}