{"id":"W4393337796","doi":"10.18182/tjf.1389049","title":"A bibliometric evaluation on furniture joints studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Turkish Journal of Forestry | Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi","topic":"Gender Studies and Social Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Joint (building); Sample (material); Engineering; Architectural engineering; Geography; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03182981,0.001088249,0.004582289,0.2333495,0.002467395,0.009774849,0.001734338,0.001281596,0.0082405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.152564,0.0005489159,0.00534589,0.2707683,0.00174468,0.006873481,0.004849976,0.0007065076,0.001006271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005546994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008100547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006347866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007247724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9293976,0.01569935,0.01922693,0.003051747,0.03093538,0.001689063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8349705,0.09773027,0.0244232,0.00571955,0.0350832,0.002073245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009671041,0.0004200824,0.4962456,0.07884037,0.01024217,0.001122227,0.008804126,0.0020259,0.001546519,0.01071164,0.02321127,0.365863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002570738,0.0006855399,0.8458692,0.01784404,0.0131533,0.00163244,0.02402518,0.003724437,0.001509511,0.005724424,0.08530937,0.0002655065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5560283,0.2152873,0.01065333,0.00607287,0.001080233,0.005811368,0.07104753,0.000750316,0.1332687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084089,0.0571548,0.008885951,0.000338862,0.0006447928,0.003205444,0.01882405,0.0001062055,0.002431106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7666505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1683341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.131281415658238,"score_gpt":0.4463499878187869,"score_spread":0.315068572160549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}