{"id":"W4393985972","doi":"10.1002/pds.5790","title":"Clarifying the causal contrast: An empirical example applying the prevalent new user study design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality","keywords":"Medicine; Propensity score matching; Hazard ratio; Confounding; Pharmacoepidemiology; Internal medicine; Population; Weighting; Oncology; Pharmacology; Environmental health; Confidence interval; Medical prescription","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3996605,0.002013107,0.002707762,0.001995149,0.002635787,0.004820451,0.004430349,0.0073139,0.01001543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5913433,0.00125212,0.006696177,0.002204105,0.008610662,0.01007199,0.005735538,0.00725164,0.0005947789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002484401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003362912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003583255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002277686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4648665,0.5025625,0.01089217,0.01190627,0.008208466,0.001564064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1261773,0.8233553,0.01893696,0.02556667,0.005381266,0.0005825136],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01957453,0.002352723,0.2202883,0.007640063,0.01701673,0.003698426,0.01238271,0.01115429,0.0017964,0.5207275,0.008680652,0.1746878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01283426,0.00890578,0.04995641,0.005732423,0.02223978,0.00356567,0.00448646,0.1548226,0.005449271,0.6764824,0.05495078,0.0005740484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2795279,0.01493856,0.649243,0.02334793,0.002276284,0.007677871,0.001058029,0.0004547511,0.0214757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8702251,0.0008439852,0.1177613,0.005623285,0.0007731373,0.00314662,0.0002623835,0.00006559851,0.001298552],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3996605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7403256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3642857016108703,"score_gpt":0.503481748549599,"score_spread":0.1391960469387287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}