{"id":"W4393995903","doi":"10.1016/s0735-1097(24)02300-3","title":"HEMODYNAMIC GAIN INDEX: A PROMISING TOOL FOR HEART FAILURE PATIENTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","topic":"Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Hemodynamics; Heart failure; Cardiology; Index (typography); Cardiac index; Internal medicine; Cardiac output; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00117963,0.001298974,0.001531748,0.001556801,0.0003881752,0.001847445,0.0004691992,0.001118006,0.003376413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003966883,0.000162075,0.0004654024,0.0008302144,0.0002619435,0.001317325,0.0006092486,0.001649482,0.001504555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002790031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003798016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003677806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006799372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992655,0.0002207423,0.00007756205,0.0001325758,0.0002602116,0.00004344903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980668,0.0007267442,0.000412529,0.00009907436,0.0004059822,0.000288847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004532448,0.001252464,0.6344299,0.0006693684,0.0006503379,0.0005032117,0.0002406709,0.001327561,0.01337608,0.001666753,0.02071575,0.3206355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006961678,0.006663365,0.9152889,0.000557265,0.001188609,0.003292691,0.0005903363,0.02651883,0.01188868,0.007082317,0.02592464,0.0003081489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8112358,0.03946813,0.05974067,0.01177709,0.003367908,0.0008115277,0.01104601,0.003690455,0.05886232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582,0.003982709,0.0262393,0.002233136,0.002003155,0.0004254495,0.002175483,0.0001631567,0.004577486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003376413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01129526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007457567494384225,"score_gpt":0.2762198321395951,"score_spread":0.2687622646452109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}