{"id":"W4394360416","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.1044211.v1","title":"Places and People: Rhetorical Constructions of “Community” in a Canadian Environmental Risk Assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Environmental planning; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Geography; Linguistics; Environmental science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00281559,0.0005860684,0.0004556405,0.01324143,0.005273256,0.003937583,0.001911549,0.0009680438,0.01405879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01756722,0.0003231582,0.0004676888,0.02635494,0.002135101,0.001938932,0.003837482,0.001397053,0.002878784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02220278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02321488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9557045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9739997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971837,0.0005795112,0.0001794836,0.0003300513,0.001291268,0.0004358527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906879,0.004045479,0.0006250832,0.0009736302,0.003120801,0.0005471035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002083015,0.00009410802,0.04346319,0.003068672,0.00006732612,0.000405776,0.04583289,0.001126478,0.0007289867,0.03472083,0.8046656,0.06561787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003389162,0.000009817134,0.07952511,0.0008566112,0.00003232752,0.00008133782,0.02123979,0.0008351932,0.0005136846,0.001719905,0.8950892,0.0000631188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.07214967,0.002263863,0.001414695,0.002085897,0.0001394931,0.0003646898,0.8593448,0.0004911165,0.06174568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1584547,0.002512681,0.005341428,0.000553178,0.00007056545,0.001356713,0.8016669,0.0003127942,0.0297311],"genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1610932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0473199591373978,"score_gpt":0.2703251040706318,"score_spread":0.223005144933234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}