{"id":"W4394741939","doi":"10.1007/s11135-024-01868-z","title":"Mapping social innovation impact evaluation: a comprehensive literature review and prospects for future research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality & Quantity","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Societal impact of nanotechnology; Thematic analysis; Context (archaeology); Impact assessment; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007114424,0.0001658915,0.0003056022,0.0004565935,0.0007320274,0.0004215904,0.0001514789,0.000221942,0.000046766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006519908,0.0001427978,0.00007221783,0.004369978,0.0001849958,0.0007228817,0.0001676681,0.0005414229,0.00002305495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001520143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001202588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003190874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001393716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983311,0.0001176144,0.0004199196,0.0003984195,0.0004465496,0.0002864405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971167,0.00009661172,0.0001397619,0.000145674,0.002496251,0.000005018082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001878009,0.00003447641,0.001501132,0.008797834,0.00009486184,0.000002272855,0.0008672501,7.223147e-8,0.0001386488,0.9474087,0.0213599,0.01977601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008431152,0.00004357025,0.2463486,0.003006468,0.0001437827,0.000005912518,0.003883016,0.0007944917,0.00005912477,0.4190557,0.3250575,0.0007586556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8739513,0.06997861,0.001755781,0.042522,0.00128541,0.005088217,0.0000603756,0.0005601422,0.004798239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921324,0.0008859268,0.0006645115,0.002973304,0.002362019,0.0003914306,0.0004395391,0.00002473884,0.0001261682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.528353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5823126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.248028422732132,"score_gpt":0.4751792069268242,"score_spread":0.2271507841946922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}