{"id":"W4394745062","doi":"10.1093/jcsl/krae004","title":"Incidentality of the civilian harm in international humanitarian law and its <i>Contra Legem</i> antonyms in recent discourses on the laws of war","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Conflict and Security Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lunds Universitet; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Reading; Nottingham Trent University; Trent University; Tulane University","keywords":"Harm; Proportionality (law); International humanitarian law; Law; Normative; Cornerstone; Political science; International law; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001044336,0.00007173085,0.0001689753,0.00005861387,0.0001298517,0.0000706797,0.0002669911,0.00004970052,0.0001124213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003864745,0.00004102318,0.00006314995,0.00005584511,0.0004329245,0.0002714454,0.00004052099,0.0002649535,4.853775e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005591599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007731685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002867074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08133382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988418,0.0001656304,0.0003790539,0.00008422195,0.0004283717,0.0001009295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994152,0.000200756,0.0001639886,0.00005663136,0.0001279296,0.00003546176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004111203,0.00007344568,0.0003714939,0.00001557972,0.00003047486,0.00001130383,0.02437926,0.00000117207,0.0001549873,0.974826,0.00004802354,0.00004709297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001466501,0.0002674882,0.01394633,0.001629303,0.0000662646,0.00003785599,0.005569666,0.0001741874,0.006784807,0.6545397,0.3152545,0.0002634412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374721,0.0008110648,2.784537e-7,0.007178582,0.000479024,0.0001192132,0.00002745034,0.000002071003,0.05391022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985623,0.0006050376,0.000001253767,0.0004564906,0.0001781524,0.000001075046,7.762125e-7,0.000003442624,0.0001914485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3202864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9354295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02437778363994807,"score_gpt":0.3153716496232614,"score_spread":0.2909938659833133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}