{"id":"W4394752960","doi":"10.29173/mruhr770","title":"Institutional Rhetorical Genres","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR)","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Compromise; Affect (linguistics); Ideology; Institution; Sociology; Identity (music); Power (physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Media studies; Aesthetics; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Literature; Politics; Art; Law; Communication","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004080432,0.0005199974,0.000730773,0.0002508225,0.001093398,0.001037908,0.0004582074,0.00005455543,0.01062571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009313426,0.0003999917,0.0005706352,0.0001338797,0.001079688,0.0004668913,0.0002152177,0.0004106611,0.002572301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001458158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006949761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002076663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971029,0.0001456441,0.0007697894,0.0006274669,0.000786514,0.0005676528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998946,0.0001569354,0.0001157657,0.0004590675,0.0002286931,0.00009355116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003275743,0.00006429211,0.00000323496,0.001900163,0.0004554558,0.0001488666,0.002511795,0.00002669506,0.000001436669,0.8151899,0.1738919,0.005802978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001062741,0.00006572164,0.000008685187,0.002543157,0.0005934698,0.00001689337,0.001851067,0.0002903962,0.000003742347,0.009432121,0.9845676,0.0005208678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008601173,0.4102032,0.0001914589,0.004625024,0.002483643,0.0004244409,0.0001278203,0.0006051416,0.5804792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6219026,0.07068215,0.0001409791,0.005973749,0.006016182,0.0004139929,0.0004170689,0.0001534178,0.2942998],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8106757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05053378075499389,"score_gpt":0.2917259209628189,"score_spread":0.241192140207825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}