{"id":"W4394784559","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13349","title":"Reserving the right to say no? Equilibria around hard trade‐sustainability commitments in power‐asymmetric contexts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Policy","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Sustainability; Negotiation; Compromise; Opportunism; Corporate governance; International trade; Economics; Multilateral trade negotiations; Trade barrier; International economics; Business; Political science; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003998888,0.0004165711,0.0008613507,0.0007392752,0.002787099,0.005363141,0.001012092,0.002986034,0.02049125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600098,0.0004075786,0.0006695703,0.0005787845,0.004874798,0.005417416,0.003414643,0.002227003,0.001061654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00227252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001351814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003591256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003731367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975736,0.001301234,0.0000909962,0.0002781217,0.0002000759,0.0005561142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904446,0.006300207,0.001349026,0.0006489713,0.0004381168,0.0008190273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009836285,0.00003992948,0.0006822053,0.00004119588,0.00001780438,0.0002806306,0.0005724111,0.01191399,0.0006720048,0.9820634,0.0009892113,0.002628857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006603901,0.00003147732,0.0003765915,0.00003747973,0.00001096353,0.00006144574,0.001251997,0.03950423,0.0003059186,0.9557214,0.002609559,0.00002290487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5545604,0.0003747813,0.1268361,0.01158672,0.0001358247,0.0001913411,0.0002743624,0.0001155527,0.3059248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926509,0.00007791814,0.003117296,0.0001761209,0.00001925009,0.00004680787,0.00001419035,0.00001639003,0.003881136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02049125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06855005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03512259110373563,"score_gpt":0.2795358806265502,"score_spread":0.2444132895228146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}