{"id":"W4394784559","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13349","title":"Reserving the right to say no? Equilibria around hard trade‐sustainability commitments in power‐asymmetric contexts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Policy","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Sustainability; Negotiation; Compromise; Opportunism; Corporate governance; International trade; Economics; Multilateral trade negotiations; Trade barrier; International economics; Business; Political science; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094647,0.0003034674,0.0005253481,0.0004223515,0.0001391769,0.0005046058,0.0008467713,0.0001702605,0.0001351173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007512337,0.0002868773,0.0002311408,0.002072724,0.00009489251,0.0004589624,0.0003048349,0.0002834993,0.002723177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002531575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000166849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005965151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004763885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997331,0.00005484096,0.0008986351,0.0007420889,0.00007064785,0.0009027554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987119,0.0001255814,0.0001208958,0.0007590605,0.00002870041,0.0002538711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005193839,0.0001341135,0.05080732,0.0000933021,0.00009744366,0.00003528678,0.0004082534,0.000186284,0.00000283668,0.9013529,0.04411532,0.002714961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004909667,0.0001192589,0.2168143,0.00003766482,0.000006411396,0.00001350315,0.0001680694,0.001396123,0.000005453134,0.3038981,0.476676,0.0003741006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6379198,0.004481981,0.0001094206,0.06248112,0.00169272,0.001017087,0.001194683,0.000141323,0.2909619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994563,0.00008607632,0.00009246258,0.003950221,0.0003818329,0.00004710936,0.00001438912,0.00002563747,0.0008392176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5974548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03512259110373563,"score_gpt":0.2795358806265502,"score_spread":0.2444132895228146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}