{"id":"W4394846135","doi":"10.1002/net.22218","title":"A flow‐based ascending auction to compute buyer‐optimal Walrasian prices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Networks","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Walrasian auction; Valuation (finance); Mathematical economics; Economics; Market clearing; Matching (statistics); Generalization; Combinatorial auction; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Vickrey auction; Common value auction; Mathematics; Auction theory; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001868283,0.0006420647,0.0009325387,0.001273951,0.0005308547,0.001226267,0.001505792,0.0009026259,0.003966231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005644718,0.0004785125,0.0005051481,0.0008617308,0.0006826993,0.001752847,0.0006850234,0.0007696314,0.0003573256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001609206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001882458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008047369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006327851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999611,0.0001404587,0.00002318341,0.00006531157,0.00009098053,0.00006917567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982274,0.001178844,0.0001368999,0.000101343,0.0002502605,0.0001053454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000125137,0.0001213485,0.0009878051,0.00004287275,0.00002520162,0.00003483058,0.00004019549,0.9361235,0.0008813968,0.02187953,0.000637794,0.03910023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007977141,0.000009961295,0.00003518841,0.000001421856,0.000001571691,0.000003135731,0.000002734582,0.9947148,0.0001372586,0.00502071,0.00006380365,0.000001440592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1009864,0.00009766503,0.8952912,0.000141819,0.00003631522,0.0001227325,0.0001163867,0.0004523442,0.002755111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5942911,0.0000863953,0.4032789,0.00005852704,0.00002755435,0.000143333,0.0002248939,0.0000723538,0.001816902],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008047369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01600105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06759753866968733,"score_gpt":0.3991526356420333,"score_spread":0.331555096972346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}