{"id":"W4394846135","doi":"10.1002/net.22218","title":"A flow‐based ascending auction to compute buyer‐optimal Walrasian prices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Networks","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Walrasian auction; Valuation (finance); Mathematical economics; Economics; Market clearing; Matching (statistics); Generalization; Combinatorial auction; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Vickrey auction; Common value auction; Mathematics; Auction theory; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001339506,0.0001283884,0.0001558012,0.0002531657,0.0003236427,0.000577197,0.0003979269,0.00009345734,0.0008192961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001050231,0.0001023133,0.0001170661,0.001688535,0.00004960985,0.0002566935,0.00007196583,0.0002245049,0.001604875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005738105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004365922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005092871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000826122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982854,0.00009191276,0.0003622143,0.0005242862,0.0004785506,0.0002576077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986539,0.0006308805,0.00006538799,0.0003960317,0.00008638036,0.0001673498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000174929,0.00002055167,0.00004240675,0.000002413934,0.00001049731,0.000004353923,0.0002293519,0.7486311,0.00003931964,0.01281483,0.05248255,0.1857052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005256465,0.00002826317,0.0004216169,0.000027043,0.000008908439,0.000007806889,0.0001199006,0.7366508,0.00006416631,0.003825105,0.258691,0.000102887],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006672412,0.0001503658,0.9834529,0.003883642,0.001652782,0.0002090161,0.000006548495,0.0002991043,0.003673271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810783,0.000003840236,0.01523802,0.0005127192,0.001207798,0.00004731775,0.000009997582,0.00001665723,0.00188533],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9744059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06759753866968733,"score_gpt":0.3991526356420333,"score_spread":0.331555096972346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}