{"id":"W4395005482","doi":"10.1111/caje.12712","title":"Welfare effects of common ownership in an international duopoly","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hunan Office of Philosophy and Social Science; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province","keywords":"Oligopoly; Economics; Duopoly; Welfare; International economics; Common ownership; International trade; Microeconomics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006913449,0.0001970336,0.0007024479,0.002126349,0.00005433228,0.0001615765,0.00062545,0.0001458697,0.001531409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001185395,0.0002531545,0.0003102652,0.0002518558,0.00009014719,0.0007158356,0.00001530118,0.0003215721,0.00004904472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001190869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003624854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09555908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9208689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978926,0.00003751234,0.001319033,0.0003399578,0.000002091367,0.0004087579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982015,0.00009000961,0.00049965,0.0003261671,0.00006213407,0.0008205576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001635826,0.00002257573,0.05355032,0.00008958488,0.0001619444,0.0001943971,0.0008449052,0.001321646,0.000005184713,0.9422044,0.0001047288,0.001483927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001736566,0.0007840763,0.05487261,0.000643913,0.00008687784,0.0003606862,0.001086708,0.0261455,0.00031523,0.7315836,0.1811493,0.001234917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871035,0.00135789,0.00007570169,0.002672419,0.002840791,0.0001073722,0.0002404971,0.000006078852,0.005595741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986452,0.000217401,0.0001299915,0.0002515773,0.0003408625,0.000008799248,0.00003408593,0.00003740511,0.0003346793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8253098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08895391522273632,"score_gpt":0.1954817955486596,"score_spread":0.1065278803259233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}