{"id":"W4396215638","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.33.sup5.s4","title":"Key performance indicators to inform evaluation of wound care programmes for people with complex wounds: a protocol for systematic review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wound Care","topic":"Wound Healing and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; CARE Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; CINAHL; Data extraction; Checklist; Protocol (science); Critical appraisal; Grey literature; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Scopus; Wound care; Performance indicator; Nursing; Psychological intervention; Intensive care medicine; Alternative medicine; Psychology; Pathology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009916379,0.0002155949,0.0009264973,0.000317563,0.0001416597,0.00008189429,0.0001246276,0.00007953407,0.00001910507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002256365,0.0001295819,0.00026286,0.0005159589,0.0000279438,0.0001687591,0.00001369328,0.000162334,0.000003586179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000820742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001329615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009805474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006117721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975747,0.00004501397,0.0009352308,0.000168371,0.001030767,0.0002459134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996488,0.0001120978,0.000557593,0.0002472824,0.002422473,0.000172535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007578736,0.0001403327,0.004072786,0.9711563,0.0006628989,0.000005599917,0.01371306,0.0000307886,0.000007970732,0.00005214288,0.001015957,0.008384268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01606077,0.02629925,0.007636795,0.8566888,0.01359385,0.0008978186,0.03045242,0.0006499827,0.0003486797,0.00008523901,0.04669102,0.0005953875],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2653778,0.01633821,0.0005384058,0.001467558,0.000304031,0.7148543,0.000131579,0.00007906382,0.0009090779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7885386,0.00004368771,0.003754081,0.0002129794,0.0002125993,0.206977,0.00008947922,0.00005105872,0.0001205214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5231608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5284197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05564816699246567,"score_gpt":0.4123037174969446,"score_spread":0.3566555505044789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}