{"id":"W4396215638","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.33.sup5.s4","title":"Key performance indicators to inform evaluation of wound care programmes for people with complex wounds: a protocol for systematic review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wound Care","topic":"Wound Healing and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; CARE Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; CINAHL; Data extraction; Checklist; Protocol (science); Critical appraisal; Grey literature; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Scopus; Wound care; Performance indicator; Nursing; Psychological intervention; Intensive care medicine; Alternative medicine; Psychology; Pathology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2109105,0.006431783,0.01430718,0.01795028,0.005927891,0.01008159,0.006072901,0.01130222,0.04745448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2405759,0.00620153,0.01625966,0.01908053,0.007598182,0.01164407,0.007991113,0.01066068,0.01250765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0189615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1179033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003928447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008301826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8111035,0.09501638,0.06557954,0.006805373,0.01705082,0.004444459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7995316,0.09588217,0.03492476,0.01649963,0.04738032,0.005781516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004839143,0.0005361344,0.0009118597,0.8403295,0.001649978,0.0009006292,0.005914797,0.001532888,0.001853433,0.01174173,0.05447971,0.07531014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01988552,0.002468295,0.005179039,0.6355678,0.00482111,0.0009119847,0.004389051,0.001838404,0.002765265,0.01974227,0.3017013,0.00072996],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002221357,0.001352701,0.002411593,0.0006034015,0.0003457894,0.9922937,0.002062647,0.00007717119,0.0006309514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002218527,0.0008380178,0.006646736,0.0001534675,0.00003028389,0.9915994,0.0003154474,0.000007237015,0.000187481],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2109105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9730878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05564816699246567,"score_gpt":0.4123037174969446,"score_spread":0.3566555505044789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}