{"id":"W4396509123","doi":"10.22215/etd/2024-15903","title":"Assessing the Environmental Impact: Office Building Reuse as a Sustainable Alternative to Demolition","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reuse; Demolition; Sustainability; Key (lock); Incentive; Demolition waste; Architectural engineering; Built environment; Engineering; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Civil engineering; Environmental economics; Computer science; Environmental science; Waste management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003888899,0.0005109667,0.0003113118,0.0003874985,0.0002995598,0.001064422,0.0005503886,0.0002147673,0.0002969239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001005728,0.0003896495,0.0001998904,0.0003727945,0.00001859679,0.000484807,0.000121723,0.0006193919,0.0002262285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002030607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002064243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005230765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008409959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997919,0.00005620978,0.0003572564,0.0004626253,0.0004689543,0.0007359156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990184,0.0001500721,0.00006600533,0.0005410822,0.0000526723,0.0001717213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003610064,0.0004812652,0.0002680536,0.00704663,0.004224888,0.003552782,0.04724639,0.4544796,0.1378693,0.07365206,0.222928,0.04789006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001741681,0.0009516262,0.01811677,0.003948933,0.001982458,0.0002865971,0.4339882,0.1955316,0.1643543,0.06143169,0.1104425,0.007223568],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530156,0.001064591,0.003493434,0.0001158326,0.000976055,0.00103552,0.00001154334,0.000784731,0.03950274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671773,0.00008586823,0.001384253,0.00008922459,0.0003340231,0.0002142286,0.0002811011,0.0001886039,0.03024534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3867418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008261823814115412,"score_gpt":0.3082821964669534,"score_spread":0.300020372652838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}