{"id":"W4396515540","doi":"10.22215/etd/2024-15984","title":"Evaluating Mock Jurors’ Judgements on Eyewitness Age, Inconsistencies and Crime Type","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Innocence; Psychology; Sentence; Eyewitness testimony; Perception; Criminal justice; Social psychology; Criminology; Eyewitness identification; Law; Political science; Relation (database)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01242505,0.0003601846,0.0005563967,0.001102639,0.001217696,0.001879054,0.0003447483,0.0008808312,0.003593667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09066038,0.0003065729,0.000666932,0.0004389579,0.0008283941,0.000850699,0.001215797,0.0007452907,0.0006596806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005672348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007182423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001728583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005328262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930101,0.004213926,0.0008066576,0.0003506744,0.001308294,0.0003103678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9399971,0.03468586,0.01550392,0.002327743,0.005587468,0.001897995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008239961,0.001477937,0.793375,0.000473985,0.0004876436,0.001244523,0.04850093,0.001651658,0.04178034,0.000970283,0.001789025,0.1000087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001302027,0.002860578,0.9625703,0.0001794223,0.0001478958,0.0004804737,0.02314881,0.002272714,0.006058335,0.0007617222,0.001276584,0.0001130858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987091,0.00004968882,0.0002677825,0.00003396918,0.00001107223,0.00005935692,0.00001969626,0.000003412753,0.0008459035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970697,0.0001067876,0.001894348,0.00004706922,0.00002256176,0.0001073109,0.00007940951,0.000003576201,0.0006691222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01242505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06571072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1832402965711799,"score_gpt":0.5071008761123229,"score_spread":0.323860579541143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}