{"id":"W4396535651","doi":"10.24124/2018/59483","title":"Archaeological risk framework tool: application of predictive modelling in archaeology (a case study of Prince George municipal)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Statistic; Archaeology; Terrain; Logistic regression; Predictability; Elevation (ballistics); Sample (material); Predictive modelling; Predictive power; Computer science; History; Geography; Cartography; Engineering; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001355261,0.0002767759,0.0006205035,0.0003960343,0.0001201021,0.000004048421,0.0004696719,0.0005961376,0.0006624403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006964284,0.0002101778,0.00009742007,0.0005491143,0.0005923535,0.00009825299,0.00008752441,0.001192534,0.00001677822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001178522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008868238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1439847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.223249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967175,0.0007327924,0.0008720394,0.0006625471,0.0005451982,0.0004699707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.001155882,0.0005771117,0.0004657189,0.0002327015,0.0001262508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003451457,0.0003120312,0.7883191,0.0002109328,0.0001107722,0.0002810841,0.03697541,0.07283667,0.000005108043,0.0004731689,0.00000115673,0.09702313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007709756,0.008885891,0.4166649,0.0001295576,0.0000737629,0.00008958752,0.02976412,0.4121876,0.0001847068,0.1307236,0.00008073828,0.0004446153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228098,0.0002531639,0.07409417,0.000008264054,0.00009870467,0.001777618,0.000079804,0.00003161094,0.0008468548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842296,0.0004553714,0.01472926,0.000005622201,0.00006894795,0.00006532555,0.000289022,0.000007292761,0.0001495145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3716542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8617156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03059508038369157,"score_gpt":0.3015157664103856,"score_spread":0.270920686026694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}