{"id":"W4396686496","doi":"10.29173/mlj1124","title":"The Biases of Experts: An Empirical Analysis of Expert Witness Challenges","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Expert witness; Forensic psychology; Data science; Computer science; Empirical research; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Criminology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04336359,0.0003827674,0.0007076211,0.003246494,0.002420342,0.003558694,0.001729023,0.002934733,0.005056814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4337097,0.0003705072,0.0005464376,0.00287326,0.003936583,0.007241339,0.005611883,0.003326204,0.0005334927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001762783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003105552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002622314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002924344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9590269,0.02655231,0.002221671,0.002051691,0.007878976,0.002268572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2629401,0.6414242,0.05997365,0.01455797,0.01703448,0.004069574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001901378,0.001224335,0.7505938,0.000714707,0.0006294405,0.001947734,0.06310494,0.008240255,0.001349562,0.08183061,0.01015412,0.07830925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005434005,0.001438109,0.6484186,0.001703927,0.0008039299,0.003745639,0.1495729,0.03028971,0.005023963,0.1272717,0.03092814,0.0002599858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677022,0.001077738,0.0068949,0.002810338,0.00003430322,0.0001999906,0.000233551,0.000008618579,0.02103841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980633,0.000251984,0.0005909782,0.0002721789,0.00004227573,0.00006690449,0.00006760855,0.000005953602,0.0006389071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04336359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2293313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09406154424015317,"score_gpt":0.2775920270250328,"score_spread":0.1835304827848796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}