{"id":"W4396702342","doi":"10.1016/j.isci.2024.109885","title":"Phylogenetic conservatism and coordination in traits of Chinese woody endemic flora","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"iScience","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Flora (microbiology); Phylogenetic tree; Conservatism; Biology; Woody plant; Phylogenetics; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Botany; Genetics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002115618,0.00004774478,0.00006464636,0.00004225676,0.00004403351,0.000008367722,0.00007593722,0.00002508451,0.00005841265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005448164,0.00003936922,0.000008708485,0.0003682785,0.0003651865,0.0001288652,0.00006212985,0.00004932813,0.00002100062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002246254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008734266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003774196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007703307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995345,0.00001976125,0.0001037456,0.000167012,0.00008312083,0.00009181788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998257,0.00009521389,0.00001931865,0.00003892876,0.000003393615,0.00001743615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001821905,0.00001421881,0.9489719,0.00001178878,0.000001732071,0.000005064747,0.001643367,0.0006614955,0.03953874,0.0009177783,0.00005232425,0.008179749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006166351,0.00002208359,0.9542913,0.0000103644,0.000001532083,0.000006162221,0.00003706276,0.03939229,0.0000542963,0.005994872,0.00008644649,0.00004197278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960445,0.0007250296,0.0003537395,0.000621325,0.00006974699,0.00006845456,0.000001976337,0.0000101731,0.002105014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915,0.00005558315,0.000364547,0.00006950066,0.000003417221,0.000007861929,3.838336e-7,0.000001856468,0.000346895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03948444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.160543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007929723991621786,"score_gpt":0.2466265868501472,"score_spread":0.2386968628585254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}