{"id":"W4397031852","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.05.019","title":"Assessment of Coronary Stenoses for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The American Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Mace; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Fractional flow reserve; Randomized controlled trial; Confidence interval; Relative risk; Conventional PCI; Interquartile range; Internal medicine; Cardiology; Meta-analysis; Myocardial infarction; Coronary angiography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03738591,0.003539373,0.02736697,0.01029724,0.0007254788,0.004256408,0.002345869,0.002655188,0.003333678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08745646,0.001735705,0.03504603,0.009184468,0.001093327,0.002534872,0.001772984,0.002291075,0.0003316515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003510399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004152302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00492014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01007981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9578539,0.02512031,0.01012123,0.00288376,0.003499334,0.00052139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9344661,0.0518191,0.008847549,0.001695378,0.002765003,0.0004067792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00151454,0.00001862412,0.002498175,0.3317535,0.653366,0.00007717534,0.00006176077,0.0004353146,0.0001064293,0.0001628331,0.0004681599,0.009537548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009507106,0.0001636231,0.002117731,0.03234135,0.9623927,0.0000747683,0.00003049316,0.0002812103,0.00007668582,0.0003802008,0.001166085,0.00002435257],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003349472,0.9934297,0.001279494,0.0003074713,0.0002021685,0.0006901353,0.0004763114,0.00003271369,0.0002324455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.166617,0.8173384,0.008382448,0.001452541,0.0004621272,0.00423732,0.001124662,0.0000574907,0.0003280026],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03738591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.197718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1487256580986803,"score_gpt":0.4540501980230489,"score_spread":0.3053245399243685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}